<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charlottetown ICSP &#8211; A Time for Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spacingatlantic.ca/2009/12/15/charlottetown-icsp-a-time-for-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spacingatlantic.ca/2009/12/15/charlottetown-icsp-a-time-for-review/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:10:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Rukavina</title>
		<link>http://spacingatlantic.ca/2009/12/15/charlottetown-icsp-a-time-for-review/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Rukavina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spacingatlantic.ca/?p=2309#comment-365</guid>
		<description>Agreed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Biggley</title>
		<link>http://spacingatlantic.ca/2009/12/15/charlottetown-icsp-a-time-for-review/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Biggley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spacingatlantic.ca/?p=2309#comment-363</guid>
		<description>Peter, the very fact that you left, whether out of protest or boredom, is indicative of the overall experience of most who were not part of the &#039;same ten politicians&#039;.  Whether during the initial &#039;stakeholder&#039; meetings, during the two-day follow-ups, or the public review you attended, the feeling was always the same -- not enough people engaged, not representative of the demographic of the city, and certainly not enough of the &#039;out-of-the-box&#039; thinkers required to plan for the next 50 years.

Protest or boredom -- the result is still the same, a document that was framed by politics instead of unabashed optimism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, the very fact that you left, whether out of protest or boredom, is indicative of the overall experience of most who were not part of the 'same ten politicians'.  Whether during the initial 'stakeholder' meetings, during the two-day follow-ups, or the public review you attended, the feeling was always the same -- not enough people engaged, not representative of the demographic of the city, and certainly not enough of the 'out-of-the-box' thinkers required to plan for the next 50 years.</p>
<p>Protest or boredom -- the result is still the same, a document that was framed by politics instead of unabashed optimism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Rukavina</title>
		<link>http://spacingatlantic.ca/2009/12/15/charlottetown-icsp-a-time-for-review/comment-page-1/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Rukavina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spacingatlantic.ca/?p=2309#comment-360</guid>
		<description>I hope you don&#039;t mean ME as the person who &quot;walked out.&quot; I did leave early, and thought the process somewhat primitive and silly, but I left more from boredom than as a protest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you don't mean ME as the person who "walked out." I did leave early, and thought the process somewhat primitive and silly, but I left more from boredom than as a protest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

