HRM - Metro Transit's new 5-year transit operations plan  was recently "approved in principle" at an HRM regional council meeting on February 9th. The 187-page report [PDF] suggests a number of upgrades, route changes, terminal changes, price changes and additions to their service. But what does it mean for the downtown? First presented to council in October 2009, the plan is designed to "take transit to the next level," according to HRM documents. While some councillors voiced concern at the February 9 council meeting, the plan still passed. North end Councillor Jerry Blumenthal was the only one to vote against the plan. He was worried about the cost of the plan. However, this plan is just a collection of recommendations; the specific ideas put forth will need to be approved by council during the budgeting process. Councillor Jim Smith was critical of the emphasis on expanding service to rural areas like Fall River, Enfield and Musquodoboit Harbour. He's worried the plan would support urban sprawl, however he did vote to move it along. The fear of urban sprawl is no reason to not provide public transit to communities that are part of HRM and pay HRM taxes (I think we've been through this with the tax reform issue). The report shows growth in all but a few routes, in some cases up to 361 per cent. And that growth could be even higher — a study done by city staffers shows respondents would generally like to use transit more, if only the service was better.